Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 6321 - 6340 of 9,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2020, 12:07 am by Josh Blackman
  How many district court judges read South Bay as if it adopted Justice Harlan's approach to constitutional scrutiny? [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 7:16 am
On March 17, 2009, the First Superior Court of the First Judicial District of Panama affirmed a ruling for lack of jurisdiction in Sara Grant Tobal et al v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
The following year, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts struck down that State's cognate law using a strict-scrutiny analysis and rejecting the State's "attempt to shoehorn [the challenged law] into the exception for defamatory speech. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:08 am by Jamie Markham
The burden is on the defendant to bring forward information about his or her expenses and support obligations, State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 4:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
These cases, the first of which was the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 decision in Level 3 Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 6:36 pm
The district court focused on the fact that most of MDE's advertising was in the form of "pay-per-click" advertisements (which typically did not include the ISPWest mark) - efforts that the court stated "creates little to no brand awareness. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
[iv] On February 28, 2001, the Criminal Court of the Manizales District issued an arrest warrant for Klein on the basis of his conviction. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:53 am
The Supreme Court noted that defense attorneys raised “an issue of first impression about punitive damages in maritime law, which falls within a federal court’s jurisdiction to decide in the manner of a common law court, subject to the authority of Congress to legislate otherwise if it disagrees with the judicial result. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
Supreme Court Summaries – Criminal Cases June 21, 2010 Holder (Attorney General) v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 9:16 am by Nathaniel Sobel
First, in order to show that the law was “clearly established,” the Court has generally required plaintiffs to point to an already existing judicial decision, with substantially similar facts. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
  But we have what appears to be a first-time relist in The Falls Church v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 3:15 pm
District Court of Twenty-First Judicial Dist., 565 P.2d 1343 (10th Cir. 1977); and State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
But Kansas law has rejected this principle as a matter of state law, see Gobin v. [read post]