Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 7,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
Is the classification of the submissions into six categories – (i) rights-holders; (ii) collection societies; (iii) intermediaries; (iv) users; (v) entrepreneurs; and (vi) heritage institutions – appropriate? [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
Toibb v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
As per publication in the patent journal, the patent legally takes effect.Art. 139 of the [German] Patent Act states in its current form:(1) Against him who practices a patented invention in violation of articles 9 through 13, the holder of the infringed patent is entitled to an injunction if there is a risk of a recurring violation. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In 1895, Congress sought to impose an income tax, but was stopped by the Supreme Court in Pollock v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
As Roncarelli v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:50 am
Question #7 – Visitor Visa v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:47 pm
The Supreme Court's 2019 ruling in Timbs v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:33 am
No matter where you are, no matter how much money you make, no matter what, the United States of America has taken jurisdiction over you and, well, will bring you down if it so chooses.One of the underpinnings of the need for SOPA/PIPA, for law to address the devil of the web, was the inability of copyright holders to reach beyond the jurisdictional limits that comprised the foundation of our legal system. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am
The amendments were made without Patrick’s consent or signature in accordance with identical provisions in the original operating agreements — made many years before the outbreak of family friction — stating that “No amendment to this Agreement shall be effective unless made in a writing duly executed by the holders of not less than 51% of the membership interests of the Company. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
(quoting U.S. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
Holder challenge to a significant provision of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 10:47 am
See State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm
(Lawyers: remember Raffles v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm
Professor Robert Leider (GMU) makes this point in a guest post: Many gun owners in California and New York will not be celebrating the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Hearn v. [read post]
