Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 6321 - 6340 of 156,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:55 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
" Thank god India does not have this state law – central law problem in arbitration that USA suffers from! [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm by Eric Goldman
Anyone who thinks the OEC’s flags were censorship should be even more livid about the Florida and Texas laws. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 1:26 pm
Beasley School of Law) has posted Resurrecting Missouri v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 5:43 am by Gerard Magliocca
Last week the Fifth Circuit issued United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Compelled Vaccination: A Case-Study of the 2018–2019 Measles Pandemic - or The Law as a Public Health Response, SSRN: Following the recent decision in Roman Catholic Diocese v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 6:55 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in González v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 9:13 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a 60 page opinion in Barber v. [read post]