Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 45,752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
This long-established rule was recently addressed by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Halbach v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
This long-established rule was recently addressed by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Halbach v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:42 am
The matter of Rubin v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
Gen. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 5:37 pm
The Minnesota Supreme Court's decision yesterday in State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:06 am
And the state has retained the Godfather of Free Speech, Floyd Abrams, to fight its cause. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:02 am
In yesterday’s oral argument in Washington v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Josh Gupta-Kagan, University of South Carolina School of Law, has posted Stanley v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
While Lockridge's appeals were pending, an interesting thing happened: the SCOTUS decided Alleyne v United States which held that a judgment of sentence could not be based on a fact that: a) defendant did not admit or, b) was determined to exist beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.In last week's opinion, the Supreme Court, addressing defendant's Alleyne challenge to his sentence, held that Michigan's mandatory sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional based on… [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:28 am
The Florida Supreme Court upheld Florida v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 3:53 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 9:58 am
California has long collected DNA from people convicted of serious felony offenses, but ten years ago the state mandated DNA collection for every single felony arrestee. [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:09 pm
In the lead case – City of Riverside v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
Regarding damages, “to survive a … pre·answer dismissal motion, a pleading need only state allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant’s conduct [or nonfeasance] may be reasonably inferred” (Lappin v Greenberg, 34 AD3d 277, 279 [1st Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:43 pm
Parties may contract to a shortened limitations period so long as the limitation is reasonable. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
For far too long, too many New Yorkers have dealt with the long term physical and psychological pain of this abuse -- pain that has only been magnified by the lack of recourse and accountability. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 8:01 am
Ct. 2382, 2386 (1991); see also United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
Gabriel Chin analyzes Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:21 pm
"[V]oter rebellion against what the press says--Huck's Hot! [read post]
