Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm
” For that part of its ruling, the state court majority relied in part upon a comment the Supreme Court had made in its controversial campaign finance decision last year in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
The question for the justices is about “the proper test for determining whether wetlands are ‘waters of the United States’ under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/07/11/10-50240.pdf United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm
In Emma v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:03 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:41 pm
United States). [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 8:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:35 am
. contract with the United States . [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
” In United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:36 am
The Fifth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
Erie Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 5:40 am
"A sidebar to the story notes:When legal adoption began in the United States, all records were open. [read post]
19 May 2014, 5:00 am
The United States District Court held that the ordinance was a fee for the purposes of the TIA. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:39 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
__X__ It does not concisely state all issues or points presented for review. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
So, although the case came out correctly in the end, it took a review by the United States Supreme Court to get it right. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
United States 364 U.S. 40 (1960), that the Takings Clause “was designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole. [read post]
