Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 6,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
The case is Morgenthau v. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
Norfolk Southern Corporation Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville 09a0047n.06 David Myers v. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
Norfolk Southern Corporation Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville 09a0047n.06 David Myers v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:13 am
Stanford student Daniel Matro discusses last Wednesday’s oral argument in Corley v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:57 am
The question before the United States Supreme Court in this case is whether this protection extends to an employee who speaks out about discrimination not on her own initiative, but in answering questions during anemployer's internal investigation. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:58 pm
David Starkoff (sort of) ponders the existence of the universe. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:10 am
Souter delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 3:14 pm
Federal Appellate Review post-Rita v United States Sherod Thaxton Book Reviews The Structure of Classical Public Law The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought Duncan Kennedy Barry Cushman Some Realism about Mass Torts Mass Torts in a World of Settlement Richard A. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:04 pm
ADF has so far unsuccessfully challenged marriage-recognition in New York in several different lawsuits, including a direct challenge to Governor David Paterson's directive last spring that state agencies should recognize such marriages as valid for purposes of state programs and benefits. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Antonin Scalia, David H. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:30 am
United States, No. 08-5721. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:41 pm
David Loeb v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:53 am
— United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
Why did the President of the United States choose instead to deliberately violate federal law? [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:45 am
In Oregon v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
David Bederman of Atlanta will argue for the petitioner, Carter Phillips of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent, and Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of the Solicitor General’s office will argue as amicus curiae for the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
January 9, 2009 PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM OF THE JUSTICE ROBERT H. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 2:30 am
" United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:57 am
Van Ru Credit Corp., 109 F.3d 338, 346 (7th Cir.1997)(stating that “[t]he application of Rule 23 does not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right”); In re Baldwin-United Corp., 770 F.2d 328, 335 (2d Cir.1985)(stating that the federal class-action procedure set forth in Rule 23 “is a rule of procedure and creates no substantive rights or remedies enforceable in federal court”); Southwestern Refining Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:47 pm
David T. [read post]
