Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 6,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Under Rule V, “[t]he Presiding Officer shall have power to make and issue, by himself or by the Secretary of the Senate, all orders, mandates, writs, and precepts authorized by these rules or by the Senate, and to make and enforce such other regulations and orders in the premises as the Senate may authorize or provide. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:53 am
White Hall Pharmacy LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
Tillerson has close ties with President Vladimir V. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:57 am
Sobel v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
They want to use the "need" to cut benefits as a way to convince voters to support ending Social Security and Medicare entirely.Beyond that, however, so what? [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:16 am
., Van Grack and Chervak rely on United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm
It’s been a long two years since the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 6:01 am
Trump’s affinity for Russia or its president, Vladimir V. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am
Voter registration only took place on certain days; on those days, there was a ban on arms carrying within a half-mile of registration sites. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:59 pm
Fancaster, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Grubb v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Carol Anderson (Charles Howard Candler Professor, African American Studies, Emory University)“The Role of White Rage and Voter Suppression in the Insurrection on January 6, 2021”Expert Statement Sara Aniano (Graduate Student, Department of Communication, Monmouth University)“‘We Are at War’: QAnon Instagram Comments Before the Capitol Riots”Expert Statement Anti Defamation League “Extremist Movements and the January 6, 2021… [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:01 pm
In the famous footnote 4 of United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 7:20 am
See McPherson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
And Virginia v. [read post]
