Search for: "All Defendants" Results 6341 - 6360 of 165,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 11:19 am
All but one of the defendants face up to five years for the tobacco charges, and some were also indicted on charges for conspiracy to traffic oxycodone and money laundering. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 7:13 am by Docket Navigator
[Plaintiff] waited six months to amend its complaint, and it did so only after the court requested additional briefing on where venue might be proper for all defendants. . . . [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 7:51 pm by Allan Blutstein
.) -- holding that agency properly invoked Exemption 7(C) to withhold records concerning plaintiff’s criminal co-defendant, specifically inventories of items seized from co-defendant and notes of interviews between the FBI and co-defendant. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:20 am by Howard Friedman
All disputes arising hereunder shall be resolved by arbitration by the aforementioned committee....The court pointed out that the "general assembly" is the general membership of the mosque, and all the plaintiffs and individual defendants were members. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:49 pm by Sarah Baumgartel
Defense counsel should be sure to make Confrontation Clause objections whenever the government seeks to use or admit forensic evidence at trial without calling the individual (or all of the individuals) who actually performed all of the underlying forensic testing. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 6:05 am by Staci Zaretsky
* Alan Jacobs, Dewey’s bankruptcy trustee, says his clawback suit shouldn’t be stayed during the defendants’ criminal cases — after all, he doesn’t want their assets to dry up while they “scramble to defend themselves. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
.), the court addressed several Preliminary Objections to a personal injury Complaint arising out of claims of clergy abuse.According to the Opinion, the Plaintiff filed the Complaint against various Defendants relative to allegations of clergy abuse within the Diocese and an “alleged cover-up” of the same by the Diocese, all of which resulted in personal injuries to the Plaintiff.The Defendants filed various demurrers to the different claims asserted,… [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 6:50 am by Docket Navigator
"Defendants contend that [the subsidiary] is not a licensee at all — exclusive or otherwise — whereas [plaintiff] maintains that [its subsidiary] holds an implied exclusive license to practice the patents in certain retail channels. . . . [read post]
18 May 2016, 12:29 pm
Hammond, Indiana - Plaintiff Duke Imports Inc. of Angola, Indiana sued in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant All That Jazz Trading LLC of LaGrange, Indiana infringed its trademark for BAMBOO LUXURY. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 7:08 am by Docket Navigator
The parties appear to agree that the litigation estoppel provided by statute would only apply against [the defendant who submitted the petition for inter partes review], and that it may only be effective after all appeals of the PTO’s decision are exhausted. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:23 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Rather, over two years after this action was commenced, defendant dissolved. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 12:45 pm by Earl Drott
For instance, sometimes the defendant in the case is not a driver at all, but instead a manufacturer of an automobile or component part. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 11:05 am by Kent Scheidegger
One gripe we hear all the time is that defendants with money invariably get away with their crimes or at least get off easy. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm
The search warrants were based on probable cause to believe that there was child pornography [despite all the boilerplate revealed in the opinion] because the victim’s mother checked the computer and its Internet history and saw that child porn was defendant’s focus. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
While the orders of protection in this case were issued under CPL 530.13, cases cited by defendant were all decided under the provision for family offenses, CPL 530.12. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 6:14 am
Turning to the exceptions advanced by plaintiff, the Fifth Circuit held first that CAFA’s exception under § 1332(d)(5)(A) for “any class action in which . . . the primary defendants are States, State officials, or other governmental entities” requires that all primary defendants be States. [read post]