Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 10,157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
For example, consider the Fifth Circuit decision from 2009, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
’” (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
This is a remedy applied in the United States to ensure that the courts are not used to authorize discovery for cases that will not be heard. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:49 am
Fifth Circuit Decides on Arbitrability of Claims The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling confirming an arbitration award. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment states that “[t]he validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
United States and Pleau v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm
In his 1787 Defense of the Constitutions of the United States he elaborates on this point: “If in England there has ever been such a thing as a government of laws, was it not magna charta? [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
The degendering of marriage has not been attacked as a violation of the United States constitution because we understand that the marriages the states sanction today are marriage and give what is required by the Constitution (whatever that is, about which the courts have not said much). [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:06 pm
” The report includes the major export enforcement, trade secret theft, economic espionage, and embargo-related criminal prosecutions handled by the United States Department of Justice between January 2007 and December 2012. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:00 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm
United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) and Shepard v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:01 pm
In early 2012, a Ninth Circuit en banc panel in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
The House was currently considering a bill to extend the term of copyright duration. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:21 am
Baby Girl, United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:17 am
The sheer audacity of trying to profit from information learned in such a confidential environment shocked the jurors – and McGee may spend some time in federal custody as a result (sentencing is set for February 13; United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 12:25 pm
Last Fall Steve posted about United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
Including the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
I’ve written about Kirtsaeng before, see also More on Kirtsaeng v John Wiley, What Kirtsaeng Won’t Answer, The United States “Odd” Kirtsaeng Argument, and Overturn Quality King? [read post]
