Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am
We’ve blogged about state laws directed at ownership of (and privacy regarding) employee social media [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:29 am
EFF and ACLU of Northern California obtained documents and deposition testimony showing at least one officer viewed the feed repeatedly over that time.SFPD’s unlawful actions have made plaintiffs fearful of attending future protests, and will make it harder for them to recruit people for future demonstration, EFF and ACLU of Northern California wrote in a brief for the case Williams v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 3:29 pm
In reviewing California appellate decisions issued in 2008, my vote for the most significant decisions are on the issue of what constitutes an “accident” (State Farm) because it is a departure from prior law on the issue, and the issue of whether an excess insurer must pay when the primary settled for less than policy limits (Qualcomm) because it is on a subject for which there was a dearth of law. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
The 9th Circuit in Peruta v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:28 am
He alleged violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, and Consumers Legal Remedies Act. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm
Discussion In MacKinnon v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:38 am
One notable decision issued since I wrote my paper is Morris v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 443 (2007) remains viable law post-AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
" The new law reverses a recent California Supreme Court decisions (Van Horn v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 7:03 am
Will Rollins (D) v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:00 am
German-American Coffee Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
(Garner v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm
I know you think you know what California law is on this issue. [read post]
2 May 2017, 12:25 pm
Here, the court relied on factors set forth in the case of Rowland v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm
Additionally, as a practical matter, some service providers already require a search warrant before disclosing stored content to law enforcement based on the Sixth Circuit’s 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:57 am
Sharp, which prompted numerous states to abandon their anti-miscegenation laws, eventually leading to Loving v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:57 am
A few days ago I noted a recent California Court of Appeal ruling holding that an Internet posting (on a Facebook page, in that instance) that was accessible in California and caused harm to California residents was not a sufficient basis for finding that the defendant was subject to the personal jurisdiction of the California courts. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
Employers operating in California are subject many state-law employment regulations and the resulting ever-present threat of class action litigation. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
No Density Bonus for this Coastal Project In Kalnel Gardens, LLC v. [read post]
