Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 6,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Harking back to a time before fax, email, and before any of our intellectual property laws in the UK existed in their present form, when neither OHIM nor the EPO existed and WIPO was but a babe, he reminisced thus:WHERE ARE WE v WHERE I THOUGHT WE’D BE My first taste of IP came in 1973, when I found myself researching for a PhD on ownership of IP rights. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
Relationship to United States Citizens3. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
This is especially the case in view of the board’s obligations under Article 21 RPBA (OJ EPO 2007, 536). [4.3.2] G 1/03 [2.1] is of particular relevance in relation to state of the art under A 54(3). [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
However, in accordance with the case law of the ECHR, the EU Members must not transfer back refugees to the first country of entry, if the conditions in that country violate human rights standards, which amount to degrading treatment (See case of M.S.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
To acquire or dispose of an asset, including real or personal property in this or another state, for cash or on credit, at public or private sale, and to manage, develop, improve, exchange, partition, change the character of, or abandon an estate asset; v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:41 am
Torture is limited to a small number of straightforward cases of assault resulting in physical and mental anguish of an especially aggravated character. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Additional Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 8:46 am
From Spring v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am
In fact, the unanimous court made it clear it disagreed with the analysis, stating “there are some significant jurisprudential problems with those aspects of their judgments that warrant comment. [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:09 am
It is a complaint not about sufficiency, but about process, and stands to be resolved on the basis of the core analysis in Teskey [R. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:54 am
Second, if it's content-neutral, does it pass the judicial test set forth in Supreme Court cases decided in the 1990s pertaining to the relationship between cable and broadcast television, Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 9:39 am
See Gravel v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
Lakshmanan Fireworks Industries v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
22 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
Palm Beach Fire Fighter’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Likely that helped bring these alleged character flaws into clearer focus. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:31 pm
Beyer’s forthcoming article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
