Search for: "Deal v. Deal" Results 6341 - 6360 of 38,573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2007, 3:19 pm
  Logic suggests that since under Trinko the integrated monopolist is free to refuse to deal entirely, it should be free to set the terms – including a price squeeze – on which it will deal with rivals.In Linkline Communications v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:34 am by J
Butt v LB Hounslow [2011] EWCA Civ 1372 is, frankly, daylight robbery. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 5:54 am by SJM
Hot on the heels of the KN v Barnet report is the Court of Appeal judgement in R (CJ) v Cardiff CC [2011] EWCA Civ 1590 (judgement handed down on 20/12/2011). [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 5:54 am by SJM
Hot on the heels of the KN v Barnet report is the Court of Appeal judgement in R (CJ) v Cardiff CC [2011] EWCA Civ 1590 (judgement handed down on 20/12/2011). [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 11:28 am
The Third Department applied this principle yesterday in People v Alteri, 2008 NY Slip Op 00302. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:34 am by J
Butt v LB Hounslow [2011] EWCA Civ 1372 is, frankly, daylight robbery. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
At long last, the Supreme Court has issued an opinion in Elonis v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:42 am by SHG
After learning of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:46 am
  Even if, nowadays, that -- and drug deals -- is its principal function. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:15 am by Eric Goldman
Although the court didn’t make a big deal about it, the court concluded that Section 230 preempted a CFAA claim. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 10:38 am by Eric Goldman
If we could have avoided this very expensive litigation, it would have definitely been a better deal for society. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
[The facts are complicated, and involve a good deal more than just disagreement as to gender identity; but it seems to me like an important controversy.] [read post]