Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 29,672
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm
Circuit held In re Sealed Case, 832 F.2d 1268 (D.C. cir. 1987), that due process/minimum contacts limitations apply in the context of criminal subpoenas, as Judge Williams reasons in the In re Grand Jury opinion. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 9:03 am
Plaintiff says the judge told her that defendant threatened to report her to the IRS if she did not settle. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
The subsequent search of the defendant’s home, under a warrant, was valid.Watford grudgingly concurred. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
The Cass case was a slip and fall in which the defendant prevailed. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:54 pm
Under US law, to prevail on a copyright infringement claim, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant has actually copied the plaintiff's work; and that the copying is of a substantial similarity exists between the defendant's work and the protectible elements of plaintiff's. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:39 pm
In this case, the owner of a Missouri City, Texas home health agency, was indicted for conspiracy to violate the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute and f or violations of the Aiding and Abetting statutory requirements. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:13 pm
” (In re United States, 895 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir.2018.) [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:28 pm
” The outcome is not surprising in light of the clear text of the statute and the fact that neither party defended the judgment below. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:52 pm
Cl. 248, 257 (2000), aff’d, 36 F. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:08 am
The employer then filed a request for interlocutory appeal under Rule 23(f), which the Third Circuit granted. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm
Barrett, 903 F.3d 166. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
In other words, when the proposed project is not changed, there is no “second bite at the apple” on issues that were not raised or that were successfully defended. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 9:04 am
See TrafficSchool.com, 653 F.3d at 827-28 (holding defendant website known as “DMV.org” was designed in manner “likely to mislead consumers into thinking [defendant] was affiliated with a government agency”). [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 8:29 am
Paul Reed Smith Guitars, LP, 423 F.3d 539, 549 (6th Cir. 2005). [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 11:43 am
Acknowledging that New York Consolidated Laws, Civil Practice Law and Rules § 203(f), is a codification of prior case law concerning the relation back doctrine, the court found that the defendant had met the requisite three conditions for relating his complaint back to the (timely-filed) original complaint – both claims arose from the same accident, the new party defendant was united in interest with the original defendant, and the new… [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 9:37 am
Under US law, to prevail on a copyright infringement claim, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant has actually copied the plaintiff's work; and that the copying is of a substantial similarity exists between the defendant's work and the protectible elements of plaintiff's. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 8:51 am
Icardi, 140 F. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:52 pm
Esto hará que sea más fácil de examinar (2). [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 2:47 pm
Memo. 2013-154, aff’d 774 F.3d 221 (4th Cir. 2014) and Bosque Canyon Ranch v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 2:29 pm
Anderson, 695 F.3d 390 (6th Cir. 2012), which held that both statutes qualified under the elements clause. [read post]
