Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 6341 - 6360 of 13,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2014, 10:28 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
The primary connecting factor for legal capacity of natural persons is place of habitual residence (§ 29 para 1). [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
Officer Raymond Thompson testified that he served Grover with the letter on March 29, 2011, and read and explained the letter to her. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
AC case on May 31, 2021 as her last case before her retirement from the SCC on July 1, 2021. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 1:32 pm by Ingrid Wuerth
The exception within an exception does not generally apply to criminal acts. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
(d) 0.00% 46 0.00% 0.00% 47 0.00% Nebr. 5.50% 29 1.43% 6.93% 29 2.50% Nev. 6.85% 7 1.38% 8.23% 12 1.53% N.H. 0.00% 46 0.00% 0.00% 47 0.00% N.J. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:38 am by Kevin Kaufman
(b) Three states levy mandatory, statewide, local add-on sales taxes at the state level: California (1%), Utah (1.25%), and Virginia (1%). [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 12:02 am
  What kind of relationship does this really entail, and does it put the library employee at some risk? [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
Estes (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 23, 29 (Estes ).) [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:20 pm by Steven Boutwell
Despite the uncertainty of its authority to act, the Commission held its first meeting on June 29, 2018 and has continued to meet monthly. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 10:40 am by Giles Peaker
Nor does the FTT explain why it found that the respondent had given proper notice by his text of 8 th May. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Tatum 14-656Issue: (1) Whether the plaintiff bears the burden of proving loss causation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:35 am by INFORRM
  It states that harassment includes causing alarm or distress, but does not attempt to define it beyond that. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 8:09 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
That decision in Reference re Subsection 18.3(1) of the Federal Courts Act was just released, and focused on two questions: Does Google, in the operation of its search engine service, collect, use or disclose personal information in the course of commercial activities within the meaning of paragraph 4(1)(a) ofPIPEDA when it indexes webpages and presents search results in response to searches of an individual’s name? [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
When it comes to litigation strategy, that which the Presiding Bishop is following is simple, and consists of two principles:1. [read post]