Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 6,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2007, 8:16 am
In Recovery Racing LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:11 am
Superior Court [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Frank, No. 06-2725 Denial of defendant's application for release following an earlier conditional grant of habeas relief is affirmed where the district court complied with the circuit court's prior mandate and properly exercised its discretion in excusing a brief delay in the Pennsylvania state court system. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:26 pm
The name of the case if Varnum v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:26 pm
The name of the case if Varnum v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 12:54 am
Superior Court Judge Robert Reed says D'Arienzo's poor attendance suggests he has compromised his client's interests. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 12:49 pm
Superior Court (Circuit City Stores) S141502 (B169805 - Los Angeles County Superior Court - BC280631), argued in Los Angeles 6-05-07. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 10:04 am
The trial court did not err when it granted summary judgment in favor of Runkle.Rhonda Dammeyer v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 12:19 pm
But not only does the California Supreme Court do so here, but it also granted review in the case (and adjudicates it) even though -- as explained in footnote 5 -- the plaintiffs here actually withdrew the discovery requests, and the requested discovery in this case was thus technically moot.So the California Supreme Court obviously really wanted to decide this one. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Superior Court (2004) 34 Cal.4th 319, 326-327; Linder v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 1:53 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court's decision states that it granted review because the decision in this case was in conflict with a nearly simultaneous Fourth District Court of Appeal decision. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:08 pm
Superior Court, the Court of Appeal reversed, and the Supreme Court granted review, and last week, overturned the Court of Appeal's decision, holding that the reasoning of Ralphs Grocery is flawed, and the authorities on which that decision relied are distinguishable. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 6:17 am
Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 9:15 pm
A key case here is Tunkl v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Unless the Court gives itself an extension of time, it has until approximately September 4, 2007 to grant or deny review. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:08 am
Shroyer v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:00 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Superior Court, 231 P.2d 26, 28 (Cal. 1951) ("if there had been a physician patient relationship, the privilege would be waived. . . by [plaintiff's] bringing the action for personal injuries").The Weiss court determined that, since neither the state legislature nor the state courts had seen fit to create a physician/patient privilege, it was not the job of a federal court, sitting in diversity, to change state law. 2007 WL 2137782, at *2… [read post]
