Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 36,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2015, 10:23 am
I'm going to do another post shortly about how Bolling v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:14 am
(Afiri & Biddari v France) The French courts had already agreed with treating clinicians that continued mechanical ventilation for a 14-year-old girl was "unreasonable obstinacy. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:19 am
Some articles will be available after June 2015 via institutional repositories affiliated with the authors, where they are available.For more information:See here for Juta Law's copyright & self-archiving policiesSee here for purchase and subscriptionRelevant Institutional Repositories: UCT, Stellenbosch University, University of Pretoria, University of the Western CapeContents PageOPINIONTweaking patent law: patent law policy and pharmaceutical patents by LTC Harms… [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:56 am
He acknowledged that smoking is harmful to smokers, their colleagues, and the employer generally. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
On June 21, federal authorities filed a Superseding Indictment (full text) adding two defendants in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:25 pm
Davis won in State v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:07 am
The United States Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in the case Cummings v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:23 am
Turfgrass Group, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
Workers United Canada Council v Winners Merchants International, 2015 CanLII 21612 (ON LA) [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
In this case, the protester loses.The case is Higginbotham v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:10 am
In Vahini v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:22 am
Marina Pitofsky of USA Today reports that “Former Justice Stephen Breyer says he has ‘theories’ about who leaked opinion overturning Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:02 am
The determination of who is exempt v. non-exempt isn’t based on an employee’s job title, but rather the nature of the work he or she does. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:07 pm
(Eugene Volokh) He loses, in Hupp v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
[Hat Tip: Co-blogger Bob V]Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
It has been six months since the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:08 am
” It has waded into public health debates to defend fracking, to fight New York City’s attempt to ban big sugary sodas and to dismiss concerns about the potential harms of the chemical bisphenol-A and the pesticide atrazine. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:05 am
[Follow him on Twitter: @BillMcGev.]Abstract: In the two decades since the Supreme Court protected a crude rap spoof from copyright liability in Campbell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 8:03 am
Tianbao Qin & Jin Gu, Payments for ecosystem services in transboundary water allocation cases: An approach for China and its neighbours Owen McIntyre, State responsibility in international law for transboundary water‐related harm: The emergence of a new ecosystems‐based paradigm? [read post]
