Search for: "HERRING v. U.S."
Results 6341 - 6360
of 25,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2010, 12:17 am
I think such a conviction would be permissible, even if the couple never actually had sex (they were interrupted, or the woman changed her mind), even if counterspeech was possible (an ex-girlfriend who knew the truth was in the next room), and even if there was no "clear and present danger" of transmission because the couple always intended to use a condom, transmission rates are uncertain, sex was only to commence after the movie they were watching ended, etc. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
McNeely, 569 U.S. 141 (2013); Schmerber v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:37 pm
Sarhan v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:37 am
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 am
Roberts Another School Violated a Student’s First Amendment Rights by Disciplining Her For Facebook Posts — R.S. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 1:26 pm
Cook County, U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 7:48 pm
(Roper, supra, 445 U.S. at p. 338, fn. 9.) [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
County of Boise, 2009 U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:54 pm
The defendant in that 1995 case totally denied that it fired the plaintiff based on her age; rather, it vociferously asserted that she was the legitimate victim of a reduction-in-force (RIF) because the company was losing money. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 8:18 am
Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006). [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:16 am
State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 10:58 pm
Friday, August 30th, 2010, The U.S. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:57 pm
v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
”) Lehr v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 5:40 pm
Back in October 2009, we commented on U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
Murphy of the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
(U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 6:53 am
Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:59 am
In the court’s view, Kansas courts would also be persuaded by the U.S. [read post]
