Search for: "Leaders v. State" Results 6341 - 6360 of 7,105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
   (2) Electronic notice, if the notice provided is consistent with the provisions regarding electronic records and signatures set forth in Section 7001 of Title 15 of the United States Code. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am
v=iMlTEStfQG8 The girl alleged she had been given multiple glasses of champagne and given part of a qualude, a powerful, then popular recreational narcotic that was eventually outlawed in the late 70s in the United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am by Jim Jenkins
v=iMlTEStfQG8 The girl alleged she had been given multiple glasses of champagne and given part of a qualude, a powerful, then popular recreational narcotic that was eventually outlawed in the late 70s in the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
Thursday we began a series on the Second Circuit of Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:11 am by Tim Zick
  Under the permissive intermediate scrutiny standard, it is justified with reference to the concerns stated above. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
In light of this recent federal enactment, multiple state laws to the same effect, and even public opinion polls suggesting support for the death penalty in such cases, was the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am by WIMS
I am just back from a meeting with leaders gathered for the APEC Summit in Singapore. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
The Court heard oral argument yesterday in Hertz Corporation v. [read post]