Search for: "Level v. State" Results 6341 - 6360 of 29,472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm by scottgaille
Contracts may allow some level of lenience, however, by including language such as “hindered,” “impeded,” or “interfered with” in addition to “prevented. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The problem is that cutting off the states and cities and leaving them to suffer for their supposed irresponsibility will hurt everyone in every state and city, because when states cut services and lay off workers, that has direct impacts and ripple effects that harm us all, everywhere in the country—a country that already has Depression-level unemployment and is getting worse every day.Moreover, the presumption that the Republican-led states are… [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:14 am
  The connection with accounting remained, but reduced to a dimension increasingly rejected by Western society as abhorrent to its ideals emerging from the Enlightenment (famously in Dostoevsky, Brothers Karamazov (Constance Garnett, trans.: NY Lowell Press) Bk V, Chp V, The Grand Inquisitor)). [read post]
15 May 2020, 2:36 pm by Josh H. Escovedo
As to the amount, DFP failed to challenge the hourly rates and reasonableness of timesheets for SDCC’s attorneys at the district-court level or on appeal. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:20 am by INFORRM
There are two judgments : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) and A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020). [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:49 am by SHG
As anyone familiar with the actual law in Davis v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The national level The national level is of decisive importance for finding remedies in the area of CSR. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For example, conservative jurists in cases like Town of Greece v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
It was a misdirection to say one needed to broadly compensate each individual. 1209: Ms Demetriou QC says it is clear that the Tribunal saw there as being a governing principle that individual claimants must be restored to position they would have been in but for the infringement, which is wrong as a matter of statutory construction. 1202: Ms Demetriou QC states that the compensatory principle is not irrelevant at distribution stage, but it is not a statutory requirement. [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Allie Gottlieb
Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:02 pm by Guest Contributor
However, unless action is taken at the federal level as outlined in this post to ensure that the meat [read post]