Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 6341 - 6360 of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2014, 8:05 am by Joy Waltemath
After a three-week trial, the jury found all of the defendants liable for creating a HWE and found one individual defendant and the subsidiary liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 8:18 am by Burton A. Padove
In most cases, it’s a judgment in favor of the plaintiff (the injured person) when the defendant (the tortfeasor/alleged wrongdoer) has failed to respond to a summons or appear in court. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
BNY Mellon sought to have the case resolved on the pleadings by arguing that Dudenhoffer established legal rules that bar the claim, on the thesis that the defendants, after Dudenhoffer, could not be liable for breach of fiduciary duty for having failed to “[recognize,] based on publicly-available information alone, that Lehman's debt was over-valued. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 9:34 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
On appeal, the court reversed the jury verdict and directed a verdict for the defendant city. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 10:11 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
The defendant wants to make sure they are going to have their legal expenses covered and not be personally liable for any damages awarded at trial, while plaintiff wants to make sure they have the best shot at actually recovering damages if they win. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:30 am by Emma Kohse
The jurisdictional and procedural barriers are high for plaintiffs seeking to hold individuals liable for post-9/11 U.S. counterterrorism programs. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am by Alessandro Cerri
 As the defence of acquiescence did not apply, the Defendants had infringed the Claimant's UKTM, and the Defendants' UKTMs were invalid on the ground that their use was liable to be restrained as passing off, pursuant to section 47(2)(b) TMA 1994. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:01 am by Sean Wajert
  As a result, the court let stand the lower court's dismissal of the lawsuit. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:24 am by Rosalind English
Background  The claimant argued that the defendants should be held liable for the wrongdoing of the priest because at the time they  “operated and/or managed and/or were responsible for” the church where he served. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant Mintzer, Sarowitz, Zeris, Ledva & Meyers, LLP (Mintzer) briefly represented the plaintiff Billiard Balls Management (Billiard Balls) in an underlying action in Kings County, Gershman v Ahmad (index No. 18893/12) (the Gershman matter, or the underlying action), where the plaintiff Lizaveta Gershman (Gershman) alleged that Billiard Balls was liable under the Dram Shop Act. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:14 am by The Ansara Law Firm
Plaintiff’s injury lawyer accused the defendant driver of operating defendant employer’s vehicle carelessly, recklessly and negligently. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:21 am by Sheppard Mullin
  If title did transfer, then Augusto would be deemed the lawful owner of the CDs at the time he sold them, and thus, not liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
  The court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment and rejected Universal Music Group’s (“UMG”) argument that the labeling on the promotional CDs created a license without transferring title. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 12:46 pm
  Defendants often attempt to have the judge throw out the lawsuit on various grounds by bringing a "summary judgment" motion. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:38 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
A jury may ultimately decide in the defendants favor, but there is some satisfaction knowing that a group of peers made the call. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am by Minyao Wang
Or, they can embrace Jackson’s view to hold a foreign defendant liable based on what happened with the infringing product after the defendant has relinquished control over it. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:04 pm
The issue in this case is whether defendant is liable for damages caused by the accident, warranting plaintiff’s grant of partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. [read post]