Search for: "Long v. State" Results 6341 - 6360 of 45,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Gabriel Chin analyzes Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:21 pm
"[V]oter rebellion against what the press says--Huck's Hot! [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am by David J. Clark
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am by David Clark
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:13 am by johntfloyd
Extended Border Search Doctrine: Suspicionless Searches of Computers and Cameras Need not be Conducted at Time and Place of Entry By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It was a case of “first impression” for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—the case of United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am by Hannah Smith and Luke Goodrich
And a long line of Supreme Court Justices has decried the history of state Blaine Amendments as ugly, anti-Catholic bigotry. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 12:07 pm by Thomas Crocker
Such notions sustain a fantasy of state independence from long established national monetary policy. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:16 am by INFORRM
In the case of Huda v Wells ([2017] EWHC 2553 (QB)) Nicklin J held that information submitted to the osteopaths’ regulatory body was protected by absolute privilege and could not be the subject of an action for defamation or malicious falsehood. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Further proof that the death of Crawford has been greatly exaggerated comes in the form of a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 2:44 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
   CASE STYLE: State of Texas v Samara Portfolio Management, LLC et al; Cause No. 2013-35721 in the 80th Judicial District Court of Texas (Harris County)    [read post]