Search for: "Low v. Low"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 15,547
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2016, 4:16 am
See Jordan v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 1:12 pm
Crespo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:42 am
--which had been a distinct possibility--then Ali might never have fought again.And, then, of course, as I describe in the post, even after the grant, Ali's career would probably have ended (literally or in effect) with the first Frazier fight, had Justice Harlan not unexpectedly switched his vote on the merits in June 1971, and had Justice Stewart not thereafter crafted a way to avoid a 4-4 summary affirmance.As things stood in early 1969, the odds of all these things happening as… [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 11:19 pm
In addition to their recent paper, Revesz and his co-authors have filed an amicus brief in support of EPA in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
TrumpThis case was originally titled Tarla Makaeff et al v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Versa v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:26 pm
"Charles' low end of the guidelines scored him at 79.8 months. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:46 am
, v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Anspor v Neuberger, 2016 ONSC 75 [1] This application involves a dispute over who owns two Toronto Maple Leafs (the “Leafs”) season tickets (the “Tickets”). [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:55 pm
In today’s case (Lampkin v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Arnold v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Arnold v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm
Defense counsel James Connell, lawyer for Ammar al Baluchi, stands to express his opinion that government’s reading of R.M.C. 701 “reaches a new low in its interpretation for the rules of commission. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:25 am
My second observation is that from the prosecution’s point of view, the statute requires a relatively low class of mens rea: “through gross negligence” as opposed to “knowingly” or “purposefully. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:02 am
Wall & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The dissent would allow Congress to play favorites among the states in the guise of dealing with low minority turnout.National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal created a process R. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 3:54 pm
(The Code 6.15) Under ‘Priority Need’, they include (in view of the 2013 evidence on file with the council): This was more than enough evidence to meet the low test of a ‘reason to believe’ Mr X ‘may’ have a priority need on 25 June 2014. [read post]
Judicial Statistics, 2015: Issued defamation claims down by 40%, the second lowest number since 1992
4 Jun 2016, 6:47 am
However, the low number of claims issued in 2015 suggest that the 2014 figures may have been a “blip” in a continuing downward trend in the volume of libel litigation in the English Courts. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 4:11 am
A Federal Court in Alabama held that the the employer held that the employer had a duty to protect the wife a nuclear plant employee from take home asbestos exposure.The wife, a household contact of asbestos fiber, developed pleural mesothelioma after exposure to asbestos on her husband's clothes.The Court held that there was foreseeability of harm to wife was evident from the very nature of relevant Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)regulations and employer's… [read post]
