Search for: "State Board of Elections" Results 6341 - 6360 of 14,199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm by Anita Earls
Virginia Board of Elections for what a plaintiff must prove to establish that race was the predominant consideration in drawing a district. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:14 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Visit our Events Calendar to learn about upcoming national security events, and check out relevant job openings on our Job Board. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:08 am by Andrew Brasher
Virginia State Board of Elections, try to answer: (1) How does a court go about deciding whether a state drew an individual district predominantly on the basis of race such that strict scrutiny applies? [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:04 am by Kimberly Hermann
Virginia State Board of Elections, the plaintiffs claimed that 12 historically majority-minority state districts in Virginia drawn to ensure that African-American voters constituted at least 55 percent of the voting population in each district violated the equal protection clause. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am by Edith Roberts
Lee, which involves “inter partes” review of patents before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Article 15 lays down a principle that applies across the board, from copyright to terrorism. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:17 pm by Amy Howe
The Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002, also known as “McCain-Feingold” after the senators who spearheaded it, bars state and local political parties from using soft money for activities related to federal elections – for example, vote-registration drives and get-out-the-vote efforts for elections that include candidates for federal offices. [read post]
22 May 2017, 11:58 am by Quinta Jurecic
 Gerónimo Gutiérrez, Ambassador of Mexico to the United States, will provide opening remarks. [read post]
22 May 2017, 11:30 am by Matthew Kahn
Visit our Events Calendar to learn about upcoming national security events, and check out relevant job openings on our Job Board. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
The peril is greater when the regulatory implement of choice is a tool as blunt as general monitoring.Article 15 lays down a principle that applies across the board, from copyright to terrorism. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
The peril is greater when the regulatory implement of choice is a tool as blunt as general monitoring.Article 15 lays down a principle that applies across the board, from copyright to terrorism. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:38 pm by Patricia Salkin
In this case, the Plaintiff, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”), appealed the Peoria Site Plan Review Board’s (“SPRB”) denial of the BPA to the City of Peoria Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”). [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:53 pm by Matthew Kahn
” Today is election day in Iran. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:18 am by Jim Sedor
The office is a political hot seat by nature of its role as the independent overseer of the campaign activities of the state’s elected officials. [read post]
19 May 2017, 1:25 am by Kluwer UPC News blogger
(…) How will the secretary of state make sure a new president will be appointed (…) and the current president will not be re-elected? [read post]
18 May 2017, 10:31 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Visit our Events Calendar to learn about upcoming national security events, and check out relevant job openings on our Job Board. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:30 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 318(a), which provides that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review “shall issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of any patent claim challenged by the petitioner,” requires that Board to issue a final written decision as to every claim challenged by the petitioner, or whether it allows that Board to issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of only some of the patent claims challenged… [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the board didn’t need to address every claim. [read post]