Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
Last Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court upheld the first ever federal law banning certain abortion methods. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 1:52 am
As demonstrated at Geo units in Coke and Dickens Counties, the state already spends a lot of money to oversee its private contracts, and probably needs to spend more. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:56 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 10:21 am
The case of Bauman v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 6:57 pm
(“Nazomi”) appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California construing disputed claim language and granting summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of defendants Western Digital Corporation and Western Digital Technologies, Inc. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
From State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Bennett, follow-ups to last year’s controversial campaign finance decision, Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
But as a result of the Mexican War of 1846-48, the United States greatly expanded its territory to include Texas, California, and what is now Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 6:17 am
California Rep. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
United States, in which the Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:38 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
United States (1959) 359 U.S. 187). [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:42 am
The hiQ v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
Independent Living Center of Southern California,[2] and Douglas v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 7:55 am
” In United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The case is now pending before the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:49 pm
In Medina v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:49 pm
In Medina v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
