Search for: "State v. Chance" Results 6341 - 6360 of 10,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2013, 1:16 am by Florian Mueller
Grewal, known for his work on discovery disputes (including the "Patentgate" affair, which also involves QE) on the Apple v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
 Says this Kat, this sort of service can be just as beneficial to people who are native English-speakers but who -- unlike their foreign counterparts -- have often had little or no chance to learn the rules. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
No chance, say the Brits. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm by daniel
Some defendants were able to deter RCDI by filing a motion arguing that its patent is invalid under Alice v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:21 pm
Neil seizes the chance to reflect upon the role of patents and trade secrets in providing information about cutting-edge developments -- are they more teleporting than scientific literature? [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Florian Mueller
Cal.): Order re: Motion for Summary Judgment (Public Redacted Version) This here is a legal victory that should put all of that U.S. antitrust litigation from the late 2010s to rest (short of a successful appeal, but chances are so slim that I guess an appeal will not even be brought). [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:50 am by Brian Peterson
 So, it's best not to take chances with unwritten or ambiguous commission plans. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:00 pm
After all, under Article 3(1)(c) of Directive 2008/95 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, you can't register a mark that consists exclusively of signs or indications which might serve in trade to designate a characteristic of the goods in respect of which it was registered. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:52 pm by Florian Mueller
Patent No. 8,014,760 (missed telephone call management), a patent that the United States Patent and Trademark Office started to reexamine a couple of weeks ago. [read post]