Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 6341 - 6360 of 9,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 4:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
These cases, the first of which was the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 decision in Level 3 Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 6:36 pm
The district court focused on the fact that most of MDE's advertising was in the form of "pay-per-click" advertisements (which typically did not include the ISPWest mark) - efforts that the court stated "creates little to no brand awareness. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:08 am by Jamie Markham
The burden is on the defendant to bring forward information about his or her expenses and support obligations, State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:53 am
The Supreme Court noted that defense attorneys raised “an issue of first impression about punitive damages in maritime law, which falls within a federal court’s jurisdiction to decide in the manner of a common law court, subject to the authority of Congress to legislate otherwise if it disagrees with the judicial result. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
[iv] On February 28, 2001, the Criminal Court of the Manizales District issued an arrest warrant for Klein on the basis of his conviction. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
Supreme Court Summaries – Criminal Cases June 21, 2010 Holder (Attorney General) v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
  But we have what appears to be a first-time relist in The Falls Church v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 9:16 am by Nathaniel Sobel
First, in order to show that the law was “clearly established,” the Court has generally required plaintiffs to point to an already existing judicial decision, with substantially similar facts. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
But Kansas law has rejected this principle as a matter of state law, see Gobin v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 3:15 pm
District Court of Twenty-First Judicial Dist., 565 P.2d 1343 (10th Cir. 1977); and State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
Hurles, 12-1472 (whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim), Rapelje v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Speaking of "text and history," Justice Sotomayor included one of the first citations of Dobbs and Bruen in a judicial opinion. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:54 am by JDonch
  The law as stated in 35 U.S.C. [read post]