Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 6341 - 6360 of 8,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
City of Chicago (2010), which applied the Second Amendment to the states. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am by Kelly
(IP Watch) The UK other Governments give the ICANN board a good working over on the new gTLD’s (The Domains) Next internet revolution will not be in English: New multilingual URLs (IP Watch) WIPO panel denies trademark holder a domain that hadn’t been used in 6 years: Webvisions Pte Ltd. v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
 Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm by Tobias Lutzi
The Court found that such an action does not involve the assessment of facts or the application of rules and practices of the locus rei sitae in such a way as to justify conferring jurisdiction on a court of the State in which the property is situated (Case C-722 Reitbauer, [48]; see also C-115/88 Reichert I, [12]). [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:17 pm by John Culhane
In one case, Goddard v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm by crush
A recent case that comes to mind is Holder v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm by Florian Mueller
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis mine). [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Daniel Tokaji
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am by Mitra Sharafi
  I had to swap out a couple of choices because the permissions weren't available and in a couple other cases I depend upon youtube not taking down an item at the copyright holder's request. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am by Ben
It has been held that the right holder did not have an obligation to provide URL’s for the content that the platform should remove in its take down request and a simple indication in the title of the video would be sufficient. [read post]