Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 6341 - 6360 of 8,250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez et Robert Martinez  v Société MGN Limited. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
Texas decisions, at least twenty-one state advocacy organizations formed.Some achieved legislative victories, convincing state lawmakers to repeal sodomy prohibitions.Meanwhile, advocates urged state courts to use state constitutional law to provide protections for lesbians and gay men.Of the eleven states that decriminalized sodomy after Bowers, eight did so through the courts.Not only did state court activism result in on-the-ground victories,… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:10 pm
  In Oliver Twist or in the modern United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:25 pm by Andrew Berger
American Buddha by allowing New York-based copyright holders to assert digital piracy copyright infringement claims in this state even if the copyright holders suffered no quantifiable injury in N.Y. and even if no infringing… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:48 am
And while the attached judgment in the Florida case [State of Florida v Federated Institute for Patent and Trademark Registry (FIPTR), see also petition for certiorari here] does not count as true research, it is my contention that it gives a snapshot of the kind of impact that such invitations can have and are having. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:17 pm by One LLP Staff
The first-sale doctrine as applied to goods manufactured outside of the United States was recently at issue in the Supreme Court in Costco v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:14 am by Lyle Denniston
Holder), clarifying the standards for staying a court order pending an appeal. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:03 am
A vehicle under this arrangement is known as a "non-owned" auto and, as the plaintiff in Burns v. [read post]