Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 19,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
.* Jeremy Phillips' words of warning- and some further thoughtsStarting from Jeremy's words at the 10th anniversary JIPLP program, Neil reflects on the state of IP in the universities. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:21 pm
Rock legend gets to continue lawsuit against HP for selling penis-measuring app named after him – Evans v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
Florida filing latest in Motorola v Apple war Nothing warms patent lawyers' cockles during these freezing winter months than more mobile patent disputes. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
On one hand, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
United States, 509 U.S. 544 (1993) (emphasis in original) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:42 am
Kenneth continued the "Trademarks and Designs" overlap by giving an explanation of trade dress and product configuration in the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the US Supreme Court’s decision in the Jack Daniel’s v VIP IP dispute. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 7:48 am
See Magic Wand Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:49 am
This week's highlights include a report on algorithmic fashion and a perspective on the KitKat shape-mark case. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
Although the case only involves § 271(f) on supplying components from the United States (also at issue in Life Tech. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
Although the case only involves § 271(f) on supplying components from the United States (also at issue in Life Tech. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Perry and United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:23 pm
Further, Lyle has provided our readers with his insightful commentary on other issues ranging from church-state separation (in both Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:10 pm
In Coach, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
Frost Products Ltd v F C Frost Ltd [2013] EWPCC 34 (Patents County Court, England and Wales) is a decision of Mr Justice Vos from 26 July 2013. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:35 am
Overstock.com, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:03 pm
I am not sure why Percheron chose to send you and Mark this letter. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am
The other, more significant, event was the decision by the European Court of Human Rights in Austin v UK. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
The broken lines of the drawing show the position of the colors and the numbers on the goods and form no part of the mark, serving as a positional reference only.] [read post]
