Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 29,605
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2020, 10:20 am
Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:00 am
V. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:00 am
V. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:08 am
” Perkins v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:23 am
Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 1:40 am
In the United States, the most recent attempt to balance business interests and consumer concerns has come from California, in the form of the California Consumer Protection Act (the “CCPA,” or the “Act”), which went into effect January 1, 2020.[1] The Act has created a seemingly robust set of rights for consumers to know what information businesses have about them, what is being done with that information, and how they may request to delete such… [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:10 pm
Maroney v Planning Board of Haverhill, 2020 WL 3165011 (MA. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 6:58 pm
Backstrom, and James V. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
BOSTOCK v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:24 pm
Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am
Township of Scott, in which she questioned the basis for the majority’s overturning the decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 8:59 am
In Ellis v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Several trade associations gave feedback, and raised five major concerns: The broad scope of the rule; The inability of many contractors to meet the August 2020 compliance deadline; (3) Whether the rule will apply outside the United States; Whether the term “use” would include a reseller’s commercial sales of prohibited products, thus preclu [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
BOSTOCK v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 10:27 pm
Because of the safety protocols imposed in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, many federal bankruptcy courts throughout the United States have adopted modified operations to ensure that physical distancing is observed at all times and to prevent beginning a contagion in a United States bankruptcy court. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 7:01 am
In Sharpe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 5:03 am
The United States Supreme Court has already ruled that Americans can do what they want in the privacy of their own bedroom, Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
On 20 May 2020, the UK Supreme Court ruled in Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20 that a planning inspector, in considering an appeal under sections 20 or 39 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, may ‘go behind’ the listing and re-determine its validity afresh on the merits. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Illinois Baptist State Association v. [read post]
