Search for: "State v. Self" Results 6341 - 6360 of 14,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Equally, the European Court of Human Rights considers that the principles set out in the preamble to the Convention refers to the Convention as a whole (see,  inter alia , ECHR rulings  Engel and Others v. the Netherlands on June 8, 1976, Klass and Others v. [read post]
The Supreme Court affirmed the right of transgender individuals to self-identify and mandated that both the Indian and state governments grant legal recognition to their gender identity. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm by Michael Grossman
” Delivering the majority decision in Voisine v United States, Justice Elena Kagan eloquently stated: “Reckless con­duct, which requires the conscious disregard of a known risk, is not an accident: It involves a deliberate decision to endanger another. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Karen Dyck
For those unfamiliar with this docket court, the recent decision of Associate Chief Justice Rivoalen in Skinner v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The applicant argued that he had “demonstrated financial self-sufficiency well in excess of the standard prescribed by the visa office’s Operational Instructions and Guidelines, which state that students must demonstrate financial self-sufficiency for their first year of study only, regardless of the length of their studies. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:18 am by Michael O'Hear
I’ll always remember the day the Supreme Court declared the Gun-Free School Zones Act unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm by Guest Blogger
But the basic libertarian impulse translates: the state should, in general, limit itself to enabling autonomous self-governance by workers and companies. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
[added to Ch. 8, § 8.3] (defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence that unexplained fall over a railing causing catastrophic injury was barred by self-harm exemption of Labor Code § 3600(a)(5)) Kuciemba v. [read post]