Search for: "U. N. N." Results 6341 - 6360 of 7,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 4:17 am by SHG
  His put his statistical skills to good use in a different arena, citing to one of my favorite law review articles ever, Alexander "Sasha" Volokh's "n Guilty Men," 146 U. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:37 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
  The full text of the message was “[n]o need for me to keep responding to ya stupid unhappy fake mole having ass … how u cring in a corner with a shoe to ya face bitch. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:46 am by Peter Vodola
   [U]nder the facts specific to this case, the assignment of Fletcher's claims to Todd is void as a matter of Illinois public policy. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:27 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Leslie, a reward case where the offer was actually characterized as a(n enforceable) reward. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
(Patent Arcade) District Court C D California: It’s official: Don Henley wins summary judgment over Chuck DeVore on copyright claims (Copyrights & Campaigns) District Court N D California: Louis Vuitton holds ISP accountable for combined $21.6 million: Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v Akanoc Solutions, Inc. et al. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more in the series, see: Taxes from A to Z: A is for Affordable Care Act Taxes from A to Z: B is for Basis Taxes from A to Z: C is for Clothing and Costumes Taxes from A to Z: D is for DRIP Taxes from A to Z: E is for EE Bonds Taxes from A to Z: F is for Foreign Tax Credit Taxes from A to Z: G is for Garnished Wages Taxes from A to Z: H is for Holding Period Taxes from A to Z: I is for Internal Revenue Code Taxes from A to Z: J is for Jury Duty Pay Taxes from A to Z: K is for Keogh Plans Taxes… [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:18 am by jonathanturley
Thus, I agree that “[n]othing in [the Court’s] opinion should be under- stood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 7 and October 14 Conferences)   Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:20 am
Co. v Gold, 18 Misc 3d 1135 [A], 2008 NY Slip Op 50322, *1 [U] [2008] [even a "thirty-day delay is unreasonable as a matter of law where the sole ground on which coverage is disclaimed is obvious from the face of the notice of claim and the accompanying complaint, and there existed no need to conduct an investigation before determining whether to disclaim"]; but see New York Central Mut. [read post]