Search for: "US v. Smith" Results 6341 - 6360 of 9,459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm by Jon Sands
§ 1385, which generally prohibits the use of military agents to conduct civilian law enforcement activities. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
Type “Freedom of Information” into Genius.com (the site formerly known as Rap Genius) and you’ll turn up tracks by Sage Francis and Scroobius Pip using FOIA as lyrical inspiration. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
Type “Freedom of Information” into Genius.com (the site formerly known as Rap Genius) and you’ll turn up tracks by Sage Francis and Scroobius Pip using FOIA as lyrical inspiration. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
  The Court may be holding it for Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
  The Court may be holding it for Smith v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:59 pm
Smith, 786 F.2d 1011, 1012 (11th Cir. 1986)); see also Ritter v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court rejected Sharp LJ’s findings that Mitting J had merely used a dictionary as check. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
Supreme Court ruled that the race-conscious admissions programs used by Harvard College and University of North Carolina (UNC) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, effectively striking down the use of affirmative action programs for college and university admissions across the country (Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am by Wolfgang Demino
 See Magdalena v Lins, 123 AD3d 600, 601 (1st Dept 2014) (citing Daimler AG v Bauman, 571 US 117, 136 (2014)).Plaintiffs assert that this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1) because they transacted business within the state and pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(3) because Defendants' tortious actions outside the state allegedly caused injury within the state.I. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The article outlines the case as it progresses in order to reassure anyone worried about the aftermath of the Depp v Heard decision in the US. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
  Turns out the 8th District had one of each in the same week, the latter coming in State v. [read post]