Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 6341 - 6360 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2021, 7:37 pm by Bona Law PC
In traditional markets, that is, non-platform markets, the value of the last unit consumed decreases. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:35 am
Placing the burden upon the Insured by making it a contractual obligation benefits State Farm, not the Insured. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:49 pm by Robert Oszakiewski
The import site, in some cases, may be the organization's headquarters in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:16 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
This has led to substantial variations in the stringency of defamation law or case law, for example different degrees of attributed damages and procedural costs, varying definitions of first publication and the related statute of limitations or the reversal of the burden of proof in some jurisdictions. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Instead, we are talking about a religious test.By the way, that is unconstitutional:“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the… [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
See also Burson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm by Thomas Merrill
On Tuesday in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm by David Kopel
[Only one federal firearms prohibitor does not require any specfic finding of fact] On November 7, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the only Second Amendment merits case this term, United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:33 pm by Patricia Salkin
Dabbs v Anne Arundel County, MD, 2017 WL 1180542 (MD 3/30/2017)Filed under: Impact Fees, Uncategorized [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Casey‘s “undue burden” standard or Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
They argued that their clients shouldn’t have to pay taxes (United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 8:08 am by Leslie Griffin
After meeting with the then-president of the United States Conference of Catholic bishops (Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York), President Barack Obama and HHS announced an accommodation to the bishops’ objection. [read post]