Search for: "Went"
Results 6341 - 6360
of 138,336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
She also claimed unfair dismissal, contrary to s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996 [9,10] Applying the Grainger principles, the Tribunal found: That there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a belief in conservatism or a belief that went beyond a political viewpoint [190]. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 1:30 pm
Unlike virtually everyone else challenging the loan forgiveness program in court, Myra Brown and Alexander Taylor (represented by the conservative Job Creators Network) argued not that the Biden program went too far, but that it wasn't generous enough. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:34 am
So there will be no fine for the Sun and no investigation of what went wrong. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 5:33 am
[who began his own study of fatigue with these words]: 'One spring, towards the end of March, I happened to be in Rome, and, hearing that the migration of the quails had begun, I went down to Palo on the sea coast in order to ascertain whether these birds, after their journey from Africa, showed any of the phenomena of fatigue. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:54 am
Seen this morning because I went to Twitter and clicked on "Kavanaugh" in the "What's happening" sidebar.If you're wondering whether writing "Really fuck you" on someone's photograph and posting it on Twitter is a protected speech under the First Amendment, read the Supreme Court's new "true threats" case, Counterman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:30 am
The matter went to trial before the Workers’ Compensation Judge, who ruled that Hodges’ fall was an accident and she had suffered injuries caused by the accident. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:21 am
The investigator, Bill Pousson, went to Suarez’s workplace to talk to him about the charges. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 12:48 am
”Soon after Scott’s bill went nowhere, a George Will syndicated column previewing this litigation implied that Scott’s bill was effectively unnecessary: Biden’s student loan relief plan was already an illegal appropriation: it was, essentially, a form of spending, so doing it without a Congressional appropriation down to the specific dollar amount already violated the Constitution’s appropriations clause (quoted above).When Biden v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:35 pm
This year’s proposal “went to what is currently case law,” Gruters told a Senate committee in April, pointing to the court ruling. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
Muldrow went to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to take up her case. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:20 pm
"Attiah went from asking "why are we not interrogating" white women to accusing white women of failing by "not interrogating" something she called "these truths. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:43 pm
Many have involved telehealth fraud and pharmaceutical fraud similar to what DOJ went after with its latest coordinated enforcement action. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:26 am
The defendant was charged with shoplifting and theft, and his case went to trial. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:24 am
Claiming his innocence, the defendant went to trial, and a jury found him guilty. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:24 am
Graduating early from The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law with his Juris Doctorate, Gregory went on to work at a high level in both the public and private sectors covering a range of issues. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:24 am
Smith went to federal court, seeking a ruling that enforcing the law against her would violate her First Amendment right to freedom of speech. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:13 am
As time went on, Counterman’s messages grew increasingly unsettling, causing Whalen to experience fear and serious concern. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:50 am
The defendant’s case went to trial, and he was found guilty as charged. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
But we can simplify that part based on how things went at the hearing: As I explained in my Twitter commentary, the FTC's console market theory of harm is dead in the water. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
EPA, in which the majority went quite far in giving the states standing to sue:The author of today’s opinion once wrote that a 1970s-era standing decision “became emblematic” of “how utterly manipulable” this Court’s standing law is “if not taken seri- ously as a matter of judicial self-restraint. [read post]
