Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
No Density Bonus for this Coastal Project In Kalnel Gardens, LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
08/18/2011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA REBECCA HOWELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
Winner, best appellate brief in the 2023 Native American Law Student Association Moot Court Competition. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:28 pm
The court determined, following the California Supreme Court decision in City of Marina v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:10 am
I'll give you the answer at least according to the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:03 am
Wang v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:12 am
The court's opinion in Dynamex v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Interpreter fees are addressed in California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 9795.3. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 5:16 am
Puentes v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
” - William Shakespeare Gideon reflects on our Supreme Court confronting the issue of gay marriage in Connecticut in light of the California Supreme Court’s overturning California’s ban on gay marriages: …it seems to me that the most likely outcome is that the Court will punt the case ( Kerrigan v. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 9:49 pm
A trade association for the generic pharmaceutical industry failed to demonstrate standing to challenge a California law that created a presumption that “reverse payment” settlement agreements regarding patent infringement claims between brand-name and generic pharmaceutical companies were anticompetitive and unlawful. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 1:25 pm
If you want to learn all about the common law "ministerial exception" that bars various claims made against religious organizations, Justice Blease's opinion today is a great starting point.This particular case involves the former dean of a theological seminary in northern California who alleges that she was wrongfully fired from her position. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 2:46 pm
A version of "Name That Tune" with respect to opinions from the California Court of Appeal would be to attempt to accurately and summarize the thing in as few sentences as possible.For this opinion from today, I can Name That Tune in a single sentence:The evidence isn't insufficient as a matter of law to keep someone detained as an SVP when he's a repeat child molester who forthrightly admits that he can't guarantee that he won't molest another child… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:26 am
Sandoval and Gonzaga University v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:41 pm
Prior to Epic v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 12:10 pm
The dissent thought this writer’s claim was closer to (b).The case is Montz v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 9:33 am
City of Perris v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 11:53 am
Google (2d Circuit) and Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 12:06 pm
The Court order in Schwarzenegger, et al., v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:13 pm
California law has now been clarified with the California Court of Appeals for the Second Appellate District’s decision in Workmen’s Auto Insurance Company v. [read post]
