Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 6361 - 6380 of 12,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 6:23 pm by Joy Waltemath
Instead, the real stumbling block for class certification in this case were the issues of predominance and superiority, as required by Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:50 pm by Katharyn Grant (US)
Focus on dietary supplements Five of the targeted companies manufacture foods or dietary supplements. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 11:36 am by Darren Stevenson
It is the first week of March, which in the U.S. means it is also National Consumer Protection Week. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:57 am by David DePaolo
Physical pain and mental anguish sustained in the past; b. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:18 pm by Sutherland LNG
The Financial Post reports that Malaysian oil company Petronas expects to make a final investment decision on the proposed Pacific NorthWest LNG export terminal in British Columbia (B.C.) by the end of June 2015. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:30 am by azatty
Rules 8.1(b), (c) and (d), included in the order (which you can read here), set out the case types that could be (and could not be) handled by the new venue. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:30 am by Xandra Kramer
In 1998, Universal Music International Ltd (part of the Universal Music Group) and Czech record company B&M agreed upon the purchase of 70 per cent of the shares of B&M by companies within the Universal Music Group. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 10:40 am by MBettman
Such an unfair or deceptive act or practice by a supplier violates this section…) R.C. 1345.81 (B) (Requires insurers to disclose the use of non-OEM parts used to repair a motor vehicle. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 7:12 am by Sam Turco
Section 522(b)(3)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that funds which are exempt from federal taxation are thereby made exempt from the claims of creditors. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 12:27 pm by Rakesh Madhava
The same applies for firms who work for insurance companies and financial services companies. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
We depart from our usual practice of hermetically sealing new and old relists to note that Bowers’ Lackey claim got some new company this week: the newly relisted Davis v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:34 am
Six years later Pangyrus, believing that it owned the Colourblind unregistered mark, filed an invalidity action based both on relative grounds under Article 8(4) of Regulation 207/2009 (use of an earlier unregistered mark of more than local significance) and bad faith under Article 52(1)(b) of the same Regulation. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
  In Henderson, the plaintiff failed to prove negligence but claimed that “‘even if the Drug Company was not negligent . [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 4:22 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The actual authority is authority the principle intentionally confers; c. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 11:02 am by Paul J. Fraidenburgh
 Under the proposed rule, small UAS would be prohibited from operating in Class A airspace and would require prior approval from Air Traffic Control to operate in Class B, C, or D airspace, or within the lateral boundaries of the surface area of Class E airspace designated for an airport. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
The company that owned it was selling a product under a banner reading SUPREME RABBIT MIX. [read post]