Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 11,203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
And in Stanton v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:08 am
That is the question before the Court this morning in Bond v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
COM ED New York 2013http://t.co/h3mFIbXK0A -> National average of interest rates not protectable by copyright BANXCORP v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 7:37 am
Mary writes: "Simmons & Simmons hosted a lively evening of debate about the Patents County Court decision in the Red Bus case, Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas [2012] EWPCC 1, 12 January 2012, and had the coup of having the opposing counsel in the room (well, in the Simmons’ dining room). [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:21 pm
(Will Baude) A Tennessee prosecutor in the case of State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
As Rebecca explained: The [McNeil Nutritionals, LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:20 pm
Notes for: --Marbury v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner) Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to discourage… [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:10 am
Prisoner Votes… Carl Gardner, writing at his Head of Legal blog, considers the current position on the right of prisoners to vote in a most useful analysis of the UK Supreme Court judgment: R (Chester) v Justice Secretary, McGeoch v Lord President. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:10 am
Prisoner Votes… Carl Gardner, writing at his Head of Legal blog, considers the current position on the right of prisoners to vote in a most useful analysis of the UK Supreme Court judgment: R (Chester) v Justice Secretary, McGeoch v Lord President. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:43 pm
By Nicole KilloranMcCormack v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:33 am
The Australian court is concerned because it's currently holding an extensive Samsung v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:00 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 11:19 pm
There are wonderful things in Rossini's Otello of 1816 (which is based on a French eighteenth-century translation, far from the original Shakespearean text), in I Capuleti e I Montechi of Bellini (which has very little to do with Shakespeare) and Verdi's Macbeth of 1847 and 1865, but the language of the period did not permit the composers and the librettists to enter fully into the thoughts of the English writer. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
Over the last several years I have been considering the issue of corruption generally, --Soft Extra Territorialism and American Anti-Corruption Campaigns, Sept. 12, 2006; --Soft Extra Territorialism and Anti-Corruption Campaigns: On the Perverse Folly of Corrupt States, Sept. 15, 2006);--Rockwell International v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 9:01 am
In Caresse Navigation Ltd v Office National d’Electricite (The Channel Ranger) [2013] EWHC 3081 (Comm), the court considered whether a reference in a bill of lading to the incorporation of a charterparty “English law and arbitration” clause should be read as referring to a clause in the relevant charterparty which conferred jurisdiction on the English court. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 5:35 am
Cuthbertson v. [read post]
