Search for: "Fast v. Fast"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 6,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2012, 6:58 am
In this connection, a reference has also been made by the learned Attorney General to the decision in Narandas Karsondas V. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
So, given these problems and many others (some of which are noted by Cato's Dan Ikenson in this great new blog post), why on earth is Congress trying to "fast-track" this legislation through both chambers and onto the President's desk? [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:26 pm
More specifically, California state courts as well as federal courts in the Ninth Circuit have concluded (in light of Luther v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:04 am
That by the way, good lack make the long stories in front of the short and fast consumption cartoons that the internet offers. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
A Response to Masterpiece Cakeshop In the case before the Supreme Court, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Here’s a bit of history, mostly from my reading of United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am
Legal and Regulatory Developments SPOTLIGHT: Why Biden’s Executive Order Is a Green Light for Us Open BankingFinextra – July 28, 2021 On July 9 2021, President Biden didn’t just throw a bone to US open banking, he underwrote the mortgage, laid the welcome mat, and set the table to officially welcome open banking to the neighbourhood. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm
Right after college, Tom owned a fast-food Chick-Fil-A store in Cherry Hill, New Jersey. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm
Not so fast. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:09 pm
Second, the Court has shown no inclination to overrule outright the most recent ruling allowing the use of race in college admissions — its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
That approach was also affirmed by the current Supreme Court in the ITW v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:37 am
The Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal's 2010 Symposium: Is Silence Golden? [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:41 am
: "Parliamentary Pomp In The Land Down Under" pjblack.me/yZUFl6 #auspol club troppo's wrap of the australian blogosphere: "Missing Link Friday – Conservatism, prejudice and intelligence" pjblack.me/ztCUvU "Justice Rares makes orders in Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd (No 2)" pjblack.me/wQWEez #optusnrl "New Pornography Regulations in L.A.: Are They Addressing the Right Problem? [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:59 pm
In the related context of private education, the Supreme Court has found a compelling interest in racial equality that overrides claims under the Free Exercise Clause (Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:19 pm
” See: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am
Here’s the introduction: In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Riley v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 11:00 pm
It was best summarized by Justice Benjamin Cardozo in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
Robert V. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 3:15 pm
Under Section 6(c), OSHA has six months to consider comments and develop a permanent standard to replace an ETS (but it is unclear whether the six month period may be extended, which could matter because six months would be lightning fast for a controversial notice-and-comment rulemaking). [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
But it's not without its problems.Ohio uses a series of three drugs to kill:Thiopentol sodium, a fast-acting, short-term barbiturate that, if all goes well, puts the condemned person into a state of deep anesthesia in which he (they've all been men so far) will feel nothing;Pancuronium bromide, a muscle relaxant that prevents all voluntary motion; in effect, pancuronium leaves the condemned paralyzed, unable to communicate in any fashion;Potassium chloride, a salt; as it passes… [read post]
