Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 68,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Michel V. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:55 pm
§ 950g(a); Khadr v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:55 am
The Court did not grant review in any new cases. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently granted a defendant’s motion to decertify a class because plaintiff’s damages model was not consistent with his theory of liability as required by the Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
Almost two years ago I blogged about a case called Doerr v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 9:22 am
Facts: This case (United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
* 58 F4th 64, 71 [2d Cir 2023].** Hoffman v Parade Publs, 15 NY3d 285. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
* 58 F4th 64, 71 [2d Cir 2023].** Hoffman v Parade Publs, 15 NY3d 285. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:45 am
The panel denied that motion, but we granted review. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm
Moore v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
When we mentioned Adkins v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am
The most high-profile grant was in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 7:34 am
Planning and Zoning Commission (Zoning; "The Environmental Protection Act of 1971 (act) expresses a state policy favoring the protection and preservation of the state’s natural resources; General Statutes § 22a-15; and grants all persons access to the courts to protect these resources from unreasonable pollution. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 6:30 am
In Roseus v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:15 am
In Dunn v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
In Williams v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:22 am
On appeal, the Second Circuit held that summary judgment had been improperly granted based on the penal law rule, however, it also held that because Brazil was seeking assistance from the United States Attorney General in enforcing its forfeiture judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2467, the District Court should allow Brazil and the Attorney General time to complete this process before taking further action in the case.The decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
In recent Orders issued by the Washington County Court of Commons Pleas of Cope v. [read post]