Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
To this end, in Brown v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
As the Court said forcefully less than three years ago in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 1:48 pm
Calabotta v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:25 pm
In the case of Monir v Wood ([2018] EWHC 3525 (QB)) Mr Justice Nicklin held that a former chairman of UKIP’s Bristol branch was liable for a defamatory message posted on its Twitter account because the author of the tweet was acting as his agent. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court finally issued its long-awaited ruling in Eaton v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm
Previously, he had headed a State-owned company. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 1:10 pm
In April this year, Penn State held its first patent auction. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Further, other courts, both state and federal, have held that Louisiana’s permanently moored casinos are not vessels in navigation. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:06 am
Biernacki v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
Here in the Commonwealth, justices did exactly what the Hawaiian Supreme Court describes state courts must do: limit government access to records held by third parties, broadening our privacy rights concerning technologies that are "inescapable in the conduct of the necessary affairs of life." [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 1:45 pm
The court of appeals held yesterday in State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 1:45 pm
The court of appeals held yesterday in State v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:00 pm
In Salazar v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:40 am
This years program will be held State Wide in December. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:45 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit explored the exposure of both the diplomatic employer and the foreign nation, under doctrines ranging from the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act to the Alien Tort Claims Statute.With respect to the state, the court held on September 24, 2010, that neither the tortious activity exception nor the commercial activities exception removed the state's FSIA immunity, in the matter Swarna v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:45 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit explored the exposure of both the diplomatic employer and the foreign nation, under doctrines ranging from the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act to the Alien Tort Claims Statute.With respect to the state, the court held on September 24, 2010, that neither the tortious activity exception nor the commercial activities exception removed the state's FSIA immunity, in the matter Swarna v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:48 am
The court held that the plaintiffs could not testify about the document because the state secrets privilege absolutely protected the Sealed Document. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:30 am
Furthermore, the case cited Nott v. [read post]
