Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 6361 - 6380 of 7,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2010, 7:29 pm by Kevin Funnell
THAT's the problem with the most critical need of a solution. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:50 am
 A7805B Weinstein (MS) -- Relates to the representation of children; replaces the term "law guardian" with the term "attorney for the child" to more accurately reflect the attorney's role Same as S 5461-B BLURB : CPLR. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:22 am
It's familiar territory for Mayo: In 2005, his license was suspended for 15 months for making unwanted sexual advances toward clients referred to him by the Susan B. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:09 pm
”  In re Kemp & Beatley, Inc., 473 N.E.2d 1173, 1177 (N.Y. 1984). [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The Attorney General's office urges individuals with knowledge of any questionable pension padding practices to contact the Attorney General's Public Integrity Bureau by telephone at 212-416-8090 or by e-mail at public.integrity@ag.ny.gov.A copy of the letter can be fou [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
West Penn Power Co., 147 F.3d 256, 263 & n.13 (3d Cir. 1998) (“[w]e do draw on the allegations of the complaint, but in a realistic, rather than a slavish, manner”; rejecting “unsupported conclusions and unwarranted inferences”); Columbia Natural Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
The 5 main place of supply rules for services are applied in the following order:(a) If the recipient's address or the address most closely connected with the supply in in the HST Zone, the applicable HST rate would be applied to the post-importation customs brokerage services; (b) If the recipient does not have a Canadian address, the post-importation customs brokerage services will be considered to be supplied in the province in which the greatest proportion of the services… [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:13 am
Madde 5 1(b) hükmüne göre; bir mahkeme taraf? [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:05 am by SHG
To see why, let’s start by considering Rehberg’s outgoing e-mails, which seem to be the focus of the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion. [read post]