Search for: "People v. Keys"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 8,157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
As people use technology in ways that were unknown at the time of the legislation, the powers will apply to the new behaviour. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 12:45 pm
"A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study on Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge and Access to Services of Arab and Kurdish Syrian Refugee Young Women Living in an Urban Setting in Lebanon," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 18 (Sept. 2021) [open access] - Authors (3) = Germany Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:08 am
As Judge Posner already clarified in that big Apple v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
Ono v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 12:49 pm
Reflex Media, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm
Exhaustion is a key doctrine in administrative law. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:31 am
, but it wouldn't be completely crazy for someone who just gives an agency a quote for the sake of being quoted to say that it's not easy to see if anyone is winning.In connection with Apple v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This is key, as healthy and robust institutions are important for any functioning democracy. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
As people use technology in ways that were unknown at the time of the legislation, the powers will apply to the new behaviour. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Or progressives might employ what Tara Leigh Grove calls “flexible textualism” to insist that the state attend to the functional preconditions for the realization of enumerated rights, as when the plaintiffs in San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:21 am
Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2024, 3:47 am
As regards the relevance of Article 351 TFEU, AG Szpunar interpreted the provision as not allowing a Member State to apply, by way of derogation from the provisions of EU law, the reciprocity clause currently contained in Article 2(7) BC against the holder of the copyrights on a work whose country of origin is the US.CommentWhether you like it or not (and, like with RAAP, it is anticipated that many people will not like it), the Opinion of AG Szpunar is perfectly aligned with established… [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
To take one example: in a high-profile 2011 decision, Henry v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
The sign also lacked distinctiveness for goods in classes 14, 16 and 25 that are usually sold as souvenirs, e.g. key rings, watches, jewellery and umbrellas. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:28 am
Otto von Bolschwing Otto von Bolschwing was a mentor and key aide to Adolf Eichmann. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
As people use technology in ways that were unknown at the time of the legislation, the powers will apply to the new behaviour. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:13 am
(quoting Wade-Greaux v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
The expert near-consensus on this subject is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
