Search for: "People v. To"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 73,009
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2015, 12:34 pm
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held, in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:08 am
Our whole profession is built on making arguments uphill, so to speak—that is, making arguments to people above us in the chain of authority, to people whom we have to bow our heads and accept their prior commitments as valid and binding upon us. [read post]
3 May 2007, 4:38 am
Teleflex, the court said that patent examiners and judges need to look broadly at how creative people normally combine ideas to solve problems instead of relying on narrow, rigid tests to determine whether an innovation is worthy of a patent monopoly. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:51 am
"Criminal justice expert Kent Scheidegger predicts that vast numbers of people who commit property crimes, such as car thieves, will no longer be imprisoned—so if you live in California, 'don't bother investing much in a car. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:16 am
Would people looking for a dog daycare likely be confused by a logo that looks like the Starbucks® logo but says Starbarks Daycare? [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:47 am
Now, you may question whether that is an invasion of privacy (and many people happily (or maybe unknowingly) permit their telephone number to be transmitted to the person they are calling, but Parliament, the ALRC and the Privacy Commissioner (pdf see p. 402) have taken the view that it is, or should be. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 8:10 am
” Ahmed v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
The Supreme Court, in a divided decision, recently held that the City of New Haven discriminated against one Hispanic and 17 white firefighters, Plaintiffs in Ricci v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm
Yesterday, I attended oral arguments in the Supreme Court case of McBurney v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
Case citation: Goldline, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:26 am
Twitter in particular lends itself to a medium where people understand statements to include rhetoric and hyperbole. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:59 am
"Here" = King v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:22 pm
The Eleventh found Harris v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:36 pm
UPDATE: Or, if you don’t have time, here’s reader Fred Seisel’s summary: “Bain Capital v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
In Birchfield v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:56 pm
In Mayo v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:33 pm
Two years later, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
See People v Frazier, 478 Mich 231, 243; 733 NW2d 713 (2007). [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 1:58 am
Not only because his win before the Michigan Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
"Is it in the people's interest to shield medical-device companies from product-liability claims? [read post]
