Search for: "President v. State" Results 6361 - 6380 of 21,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court declined to rule on the merits in Zubik v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:29 am by Lyle Denniston
His order blocking enforcement is now under review by the Justices in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:11 am by SHG
The best reason I can come up with is that under the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 3:18 am by SHG
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 12:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
["In January 2020, you called for 'an involuntary evaluation' of President Trump, and you said, 'I am beginning to believe a mental health hold ... will become inevitable.' That same month, you publicly suggested that President Trump, Rudolph Giuliani and Alan Dershowitz had a 'shared psychosis.'"] Lee v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:45 am
Smith is vice-president and part owner of Sequoia Voting Systems. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm by WIMS
When I took office, the country faced years of litigation and confusion because of conflicting rules set by Congress, federal regulators and states [See WIMS 5/19/09]. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:23 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
" Large Jury Award Vacated Because of Faulty Instruction on Bicyclist Duties In Mariano Simota Bailey v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:31 am by Maureen Johnston
Kerry 13-628Issue: Whether a federal statute that directs the Secretary of State, on request, to record the birthplace of an American citizen born in Jerusalem as born in "Israel" on a Consular Report of Birth Abroad and on a United States passport is unconstitutional on the ground that the statute "impermissibly infringes on the President's exercise of the recognition power reposing exclusively in him." [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 2:51 pm by Brian Shyr
Circuit just before President Donald Trump was inaugurated. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:33 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
District Court for the Western District of Missouri (EEOC, et al. v. [read post]