Search for: "Reproductive Rights" Results 6361 - 6380 of 8,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Ed Wallis
The blood returns to the heart and enters a collecting chamber called the right atrium from which it travels to a second chamber called the right ventricle. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by JD Hull
Born right here, and part of Hull McGuire cosmos since the 1990s, The 12 Rules of Client Service try to align client and lawyer interests and reduce reproduction of Law Cattle in The West. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm by Ed Wallis
Wellbutrin carries a Pregnancy Category C classification, meaning that animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect on the fetus but that no adequate or well-controlled studies in humans have been performed. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:44 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
The suit was filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights [advocacy website] in 2005 after the FDA failed to respond to a 2001 petition to make Plan B available over the counter (OTC) to women... [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:42 am by Jonathan Bailey
Tune in every Wednesday evening at 5 PM ET for the live recording of the Copyright 2.0 Show or wait and get the edited version Friday right here on Plagiarism Today. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:19 am by Mike Brickner, ACLU of Ohio
Learn more about reproductive freedom: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
 In this post, I want to consider the restriction of reproductive rights in the context of a story that appeared in the New York Times over the weekend. [read post]
Learn more about your rights: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
The FDA could have done the right thing but sadly it abrogated its regulatory role to the powerful business interests and lobbyists at the hearing. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:30 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 Reproductive rights organizations condemned the Administration’s decision. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 1:57 pm by Avinash Samarth, Human Rights Program
For example, the current administration has re-engaged with international human rights bodies and provided vigorous leadership in fighting for LGBT equality, demanded easier access to reproductive health services and information, and championed free speech and freedom of assembly.But while some U.S. laws and policies have been comparatively advanced in protecting civil rights and civil liberties, the U.S. has fallen behind in protecting the universal human… [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 1:01 pm by Ed Wallis
Wellbutrin carries a Pregnancy Category C classification, meaning that animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect on the fetus but that no adequate or well-controlled studies in humans have been performed. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 5:05 am
 Although it is important to stop rights holders from bullying third parties, these protections have become problematic. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:01 pm by davidmginsberg
It is not that I want to take away or restrict any woman’s reproductive and/or sexual rights. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:44 am
From this morning’s Washington Post: “We are outraged that this administration has let politics trump science,” said Kirsten Moore of the Reproductive Health Technologies Project, a Washington-based advocacy group. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:57 pm by PunditMom
  Maybe polling shows those demographics don’t vote much, so the administration can ignore promises made in the past in order to woo some conservative voters who don’t like reproductive rights or Americans who need financial assistance. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:31 am by davidmginsberg
We used to have that ability, before our parties became more concerned with: (i) specific and divisive issues (like reproductive rights and tax cuts); (ii) getting re-elected and getting party members to powerful positions and enacting legislation which benefits specific constituents; and, (iiii) short term results instead of long term interests. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:37 am by Kluwer Blogger
What the Austrian Supreme Court says here seems to me to be in line with the CJEU’s reasoning in Infopaq on reproduction in part: only if the part reproduced expresses the author’s own intellectual creation does the reproduction right come into play. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 4:31 pm by Jake Linford
Committing my findings to vinyl, compact disc, or mp3, using the original recordings, technically violate 17 USC 106(1)'s prohibition on unauthorized reproduction. [read post]