Search for: "See v. See" Results 6361 - 6380 of 122,007
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2023, 3:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The functionality or ideas that lie behind the code is protected (SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 at §20-§37). [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:11 pm by Patent Docs
While some of these briefs, for both Petitioners (see "Patent Law Academics File Amicus Brief in Amgen v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
But that notion is inconsistent with the seminal compelled-speech case, Wooley v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:41 am by Charnovitz
See https://charnovitz.org/publications/Solving_the_Challenges-PDF.11.17.21.pdf. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am by Nicholas Weigel
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 3:15 am
”Because it shared the view that the police frequently encounter “hazardous conditions,” and that incidents of this sort are considered “inherent risks of the work,” the AD3 confirmed the denial of relief in the officer's favor.That certainly was no accident.# # #DECISIONMatter of M. v Gardner [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
By Sophia Williams From 1933 to 1945, during the Nazi party’s rise to power, the Nazis looted, confiscated, or involuntarily transferred more than half a million artworks owned by Jewish art collectors and other victims.[1] Following Nazi party looting before and after World War II, thousands of artworks ended up in museum collections around the world, including in New York, and remain there today.[2] A recent act passed in August 2022 “to amend the education law, in relation to notice… [read post]