Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 6361 - 6380
of 71,795
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2020, 3:56 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has released an eleven page report titled, “Adjusting to Alice: USPTO Patent Examination Outcomes After Alice Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:46 pm
From Pinter-Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 12:04 pm
The Court’s 6-3 opinion in County of Maui v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 10:14 am
" White v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
” Entress v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:34 am
[Why an originalist might think the same right can mean different things against the state and federal governments after all] There's lots to say about Monday's decision in Ramos v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am
The Court affirmed that state courts are not barred from challenging EPA’s selected remedial action The Supreme Court disagreed with ARCO’s argument that CERCLA preempts state courts from challenging the remedial action selected by the EPA. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:52 am
In a unanimous decision the US Supreme Court held in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:52 am
In a unanimous decision the US Supreme Court held in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
” That royalty is no pittance: In Hughes Aircraft v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:35 am
Demar v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:21 am
Young, Petitioner, v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am
This test essentially, thus, lays down that where an act is done intentionally, has an effect within the forum state and is directed or targeted at the forum state, then jurisdiction will be satisfied.[5] Thus, the effects test is useful when the exact nature of the defendant’s internet activities need to be assessed vis-à-vis, injury caused to a resident elsewhere, in a different State.[6] The legal position in the US has been seemingly settled, off… [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:40 pm
In the County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:47 pm
And plaintiffs are understandably angered by the state's inaction. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
’s (“PJM”) capacity market which receive so-called “State Subsidies”.[2] FERC reaffirmed that a resource within broadly-defined categories (e.g., renewable resources) receiving State Subsidies must offer capacity in PJM’s forward capacity market at or above an administratively-established price floor (i.e., the minimum offer price rule, or “MOPR”), regardless of such a resource’s actual… [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 3:46 pm
Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:08 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:05 pm
Washington and Colorado v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:49 am
Plaintiffs allege that state actors are responsible, as opposed to local entities, based on the state's general supervision of all public education, and also on the state's specific interventions in Detroit's public schools. [read post]
