Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2016, 12:49 pm
(See my July 2014 policy study on the California rule.) [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
In Hiller v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:07 am
Crossfit, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:51 am
Facts: This case (McKeon v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:01 am
In a recent case, Pilmer v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 2:31 pm
In particular, Nicaragua v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 12:40 am
In its much awaited judgment in the Delhi University photocopying case (The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:19 am
The study has been criticized for being too loose with the supporting state practice and opinio juris, but even if it is, it will shape expectations on IHL going forward. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am
From June 26 to July 21, Justice Clarence Thomas served as the instructor for a constitutional law course at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law’s study abroad program in Nice, France. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
Lishman (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1288), or a more deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review (as held by Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:58 pm
[Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 11:34 am
See Illinois v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:00 am
Third: Three states (CA, MS, WV) do not a totalitarian regime make. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:28 am
(I will spare you a rehash of the meaning of “established by the state. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
Several empirical studies suggest the Roberts Court is particularly pro-business, perhaps even more than a simple consideration of expected judicial ideology would predict. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:45 pm
In Wilson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:28 pm
Indeed, studies have been published ostensibly demonstrating that state regulators poses more valuable information on their system than what appears on FINRA’s public Broker-Check data base. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 11:28 am
The lawsuits (States of Nevada, et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:48 am
The appeals court also remanded for a new trial on their disparate treatment claim, finding that the district court provided an erroneous jury instruction (Ernst v. [read post]
