Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 16,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2021, 9:56 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 7:55 pm
The first case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am
United States (Mar. 27): For purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, which imposes an enhanced sentence for unlawful possession of a firearm if the defendant has three convictions “committed on occasions different from one another,” should a jury or a judge decide whether the crimes occurred on different occasions? [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:04 am
From the Court’s perspective, the Federal Circuit’s unwillingness to take the Court’s decisions in Octane and Highmark seriously forced the Court to devote an hour of its argument calendar to a case that is analytically identical to cases that are still too recent for the United States Reports. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:48 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit 2014); United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 2:13 pm
We know from United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 10:14 pm
Based upon the recent dissenting views of at least judges Dyk and Newman in Bedgear LLC., v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:14 pm
" United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:47 am
The IPKat has just found out that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has now handed down its opinion in Voda v Cordis (1st February 2007).The issue before the court was whether or not a US District Court could exercise jurisdiction over a case involving the infringement of a foreign (non-US) patent (the court listed those patents: British, Canadian, European (sic), French and German patents) under the supplemental jurisdiction statute (28 USC §1367).The court (split… [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:37 pm
United States presents a seemingly simple statutory question. [read post]
17 May 2019, 7:04 am
” The case is United States v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:24 am
Circuit, Scott Silliman of Duke, and Judge Royce Lamberth. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo In a 10-3 decision today, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has upheld a trial court injunction against President Trump’s revised travel ban executive order, temporarily barring citizens of six Muslim-majority nations from entering the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 7:28 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:49 am
by Dennis Crouch Correll v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:22 am
United States Securities and Exchange Comm'n v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:05 am
(The emphasized clause was revised after the Federal Circuit decision in Novartis v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
Earlier today, in United States v. [read post]
